Recruitment and Compensation - News and Comments
Caps on Banker's bonuses - Devil is in the
Detail
When Gordon
Brown tries to
garner support for a limit on banker's bonuses one is reminded
that talk is cheap. But the devil is in the detail: who decides?
what is the right amount of bonus? what will be the side-effects?
(certainly an increase in base pay, if not in other fringe
benefits)What is a bank? If payment is regulated at banks, will
people and business not migrate to other areas of financial markets
like brokers, investment banks and hedge funds? (not to mention the
likely migration to emerging financial centres that are outside the
global G2/G7/G10/G20/OECD cartel?
1-Sept-2009
Better
Credit Research one of the lessons of the Credit Crunch
The Credit Crunch that we experienced during the past 2 years has
produced – apart from financial pain the world over – an
unprecedented amount of hot air. We are talking about the countless
statements by politicians and self-appointed pundits in the media
and academia who have proposed various measures of reform.
Rather than waiting on the outcome of the ‘Global Dialogue’ we
suggest investors rely on common sense and focus on improving their
own protection against the recurrence of a similar disaster.
Credit Research should be high on the priority list of every Chief
Investment Officer or Senior Investment Professional.
We are not surprised to see strong demand for seasoned credit
analysts and expect this to continue. Fortunately the convulsions in
the financial markets have also resulted in a number of good quality
analysts becoming available through no fault of their own.
Should you be looking to upgrade or expand your credit research
effort we would be happy to discuss this with you or someone in your
organisation. As a gesture of goodwill we offer a discount on our
usual fees for all candidates already on our register that we place
with our clients.
12-Jun-2009
Wrong
time to raise levels of base salaries
Several
Investment Banks have decided (or are
investigating) to increase basic pay of employees in compensation
for (expected) lower bonus payouts in the future. We think that this
rush to boost the fixed costs of the business may be pre-mature. A
recent report predicted that global investment banking revenues will
drop by about a quarter this year. Revenues from the Securities
Business may also not hold up after a quite profitable period at the
beginning of 2009 and revenues from Asset Management will remain
under pressure. Then there is the political aspect as the industry
has just been saved from itself at great expense to the taxpayer.
Even the well-run companies can only thank governments as without
the bailout they would have been gone down together with the weak
banks in the financial tsunami of 2008. So it may appear that
already well-paid professionals get compensated for the loss of
bonuses that may not be there (or might be much reduced) at the end
of 2009.
9-Jun-2009
Danger
of trying to buy market share
A short press
article ('As Merrill Lynch
sputtered, it made a big bet on Brazil', Wall St Journal, 10
March 2009) reminded us of the danger of trying to buy market share
in any business by throwing money at top people working for the
competition.
Not only is it far from certain that the executives lured away will
flourish in a different business culture at the new employer. If
their recruitment can only be effected at high - or even exorbitant
- compensation levels it may also be an indicator that the business
one tries to enter has already reached a peak and may no longer
offer the growth prospects one is looking for.
Selective hiring of top individuals at top compensation levels may
be worthwhile in isolated cases. However, employers should take
great care before committing themselves to a large financial outlay
and conduct extra due diligence rather than getting carried away or
'falling in love' with prospective candidates.
10-Mar-09
100%
retention bonuses for Merrill Lynch brokers
It seems strange that BofA is ready to offer substantial
retention bonuses for the retail brokers at Merrill Lynch. Apart
from the image-problem that this generosity might create in the
present political climate one has to ask the following
questions: where would all these brokers move to if they would
not receive a retention bonus of this magnitude? Would clients
be comfortable moving their funds in these uncertain times? Does
Merrill Lynch not have any adequate no-compete clauses in its
terms of employment that prevent the brokers from taking their
clients with them? And if the financial advisers get these juicy
retention payments, what will their customers thing most of whom
probably have lost a lot of money?
27-Oct-08
Compensation:
what now for cash vs stock split?
Some recent commentators have predicted that in the future the
Securities Industry will pay a higher proportion of total compensation in
the form of shares and options in order to stimulate a more risk-conscious
behaviour pattern among staff. While this may sound plausible it does not
necessarily make sense for the majority of employees in a securities firm.
Why should the
government bond trader whose P&L is clearly visible at the end of each day
and whose book does not contain any long-term risks be paid in instalments
that only become due many years after he has produced the goods?
The recent - and ongoing collapse - in the share prices of most brokerage
firms and banks is in the majority hitting employees who did not have any
influence on the poor decisions made by the senior management of those
firms. To add insult to injury one could say that the top executives who
have been asked to leave have done much better than those employees that are
left behind and have to suffer the consequences of a rapid decline in the
value of their company stock or share options that the ineptness of the
departing senior managers has caused.
30-Jun-08
Bonus Fears: Not as bad as the headlines make believe
Some newspaper headlines predict massive job losses and a
substantial drop in bonuses for financial market professionals this
year.
Apart from creating a bit of publicity for some of our competitors
who are quoted by the media we advise clients and candidates to keep
a cool head and focus on the big picture.
Excessive discussions about the expected level of bonuses are a
nuisance in the best of times and for many firms the year is only
over on 31 December. So there is still a lot to play for. Emerging
Markets are booming (too much?), and fund-raising continues at a
frenetic pace in the alternative investment field.
04-Oct-07
Exit
'Fred the Shred'- Character traits in Chief Executives
We have never personally met Fred Goodwin but reading an article
about him we were reminded that many corporate desasters happened
under the leadership of executives that were described as
domineering. Whatever the merits of this adjective in Goodwin's case
- any analyst worth his salt should scan press articles for similar
key words and have a good second look at any business that is run by
someone described with these words.
10-Nov-07
Lessons
from a Boat Race -
Or how to make teams work
better together
Can business leaders really learn from a study in
which the Cambridge University boat club has been observed at work
during seven-months period?
That would be the impression one could get from reading the conclusion
by Mark de Rond, a senior
Lecturer at the Judge business school in Cambridge, who conducted an
'ethnographic' study of the boat team as it prepared for the annual
Oxford-Cambridge boat race on April 7.
Dr de Rond concludes that a team in a boat is a social entity and it
can be a massive brake on the boat if the team members are not all
working together.
We think that this is a truism - especially in the lower ranks of
management.
Earlier in the same column ('Business Life' by Stefan Stern, Financial Times)
the author stated that 'at the highest
level (of management) you must perform in areas that are beyond your
expertise, where the facts are not known'.
This, in our view, is
the key problem of leadership. The key to top management performance
is not just higher efficiency. Clear targets can easily be defined for
staff and lower levels of management - as well as the members of a
race team. But Business Leaders have to move into the (dark) future and
decisions have to be made where the outcomes are never clearly
visible.
In our opinion good management at the highest level requires a balance
between good judgement and experience. The same applies to the selection of
top management - be it from internal or external
candidates. It will always remain a mix of science and art.
3-April-2007
Professionals should do well again in 2007
The larger firms have built their
staff levels from a standing start (Goldman had 56 employees in
1978 in London, Morgan Stanley had not even opened an office) to a
cast of thousands.
This was an extraordinary period of expansion that has come to an
end. At best, employment levels will stagnate at this high level
and fluctuate slightly around it with the ebb and flow of business
levels.
Professionals should be relatively safe from the trend towards
overseas outsourcing or automation. Individual employees, however,
will be under pressure to perform and may be weeded out in favour
of younger staff that is potentially cheaper and keen to move up
the career ladder.
10-Feb-07
Arbitrary bonus
allocation creates legal minefield
The Financial Services
Industry is in the middle of the annual round of deciding the size of
the bonus pool for its employees as well as the distribution of the
payments between the various departments and staff members. Recent
Press comments let us send a word of caution to Senior Management and
Human Resource Departments.
We are very sympathetic to management's desire to reward those among
their staff that they think offer the best potential to make good
contributions in the future. So we are not surprised that employers may wish to award the bulk of their
bonus pool to the most profitable employees or to younger staff that they
wish to motivate.
However, today's litigious workplace limits the amount of discretion
employers have without running the risk of being dragged into damaging and
costly legal disputes.
Awarding bonuses on anything
less than objective standards creates a legal minefield for the employer as those
employees that have received a low bonus may be tempted to have their
compensation reviewed by an employment tribunal or even in a court of law.
Some firms still have no adequate internal system to allocate profits on an
objective basis and they should now urgently review their management controls. They
will need them so that they can
make sure that bonus payments are backed up by hard numbers that can stand up
to scrutiny in a court if staff members feel that their bonus was allocated
in an arbitrary fashion.
15-Jan-07
Bonus
time approaching fast
When discussing bonus trends we always jokingly say that if all the
bonus hopes in the City were to be full-filled in any given year, the
bonus pool - however large it might in fact be - would have to be
twice the size to satisfy the hopes of recipients.
Earlier
this year we warned that employers should take great care to award
bonus payments in a rationale and well-documented fashion.
Recently we found an interesting piece posted by Freshfields on the
Complinet website.
This supports our warnings and discusses ways for employers to avoid contractual
claims arising out of bonus decisions. The Freshfield article touches
on questions such
as: Is there any entitlement to be considered for a bonus? To what
extent can a bonus be fully discretionary (if at all)? How to avoid
discrimination claims.
16-Nov-06
Bonus payments cannot favour the
few
Recent court decisions make it dangerous to allocate the bonus pool in a
discriminatory fashion. It is sometimes said that the major share of the
bonus pool may be given to the proverbial big hitters which bring in the
lion share of the revenues.
This can only be acceptable as long as the distribution of the bonus pool is
justified by production numbers.
Any deviation leaves firms and their line managers open to law suits by
professionals who consider themselves treated unfairly.
Every firm and department always will have a few big producers among staff.
Often they are just lucky to be allocated the best clients. This may be due
to the fact that they are the best professionals, - but even then their
production numbers are only made possible by the presence of an
infrastructure supported by their team colleagues. This aspect will always
exert a levelling influence on the disparity of bonus levels among staff.
9-Mar-05
Hedge Funds a boon to
employment
As we predicted earlier in the year the job market in the financial service
sector is vibrant but there is probably no net expansion in overall
employment levels. The one factor that should not be ignored is the
tremendous support that the job market has received from the extraordinary
growth in the hedge fund industry.
While most Funds are small and even the largest group employ at best a
couple of hundred people the sheer number of funds and supporting firms or
divisions in the traditional securities industry means that many an analyst,
salesperson or investment manager that would otherwise have been unemployed
is secure for now. This in turn supports salary levels for those in
employment in firms that are not directly involved in Hedge Funds.
11-April-05
|